Decision to drop charges against Zuma was ‘rational’
On the eve of the start of the review of the 2009 decision to drop corruption charges against President Jacob Zuma, the Presidency has defended the decision by the NDPP as “rational”.
The North Gauteng High Court will on Tuesday begin hearing the opposition Democratic Alliance’s application to set aside the National Prosecuting Authority’s decision in April 2009 to drop 738 charges of fraud, corruption and racketeering against Zuma.
In a statement issued late on Monday night, the Presidency said: “The Court Application has been relentlessly pursued over a period of some seven years and seeks to review and set aside the NDPP’s decision. The President has always contended that the court proceedings are an abuse of process by a political party in order to advance a political agenda.
“Through his submissions to the High Court, President Zuma will maintain that the decision of the NDPP was rationally derived at, as evidenced by the reasons advanced and accordingly, will withstand any scrutiny.”
The charges stemmed from the country’s 1999 arms deal and the decision by then acting NPA head Mokotedi Mpshe to withdraw these, paved the way for Zuma’s election as president the following month.
The DA went to court soon after, but the actual review has been more than six years in the coming because of a lengthy case within a case to secure the release of the so-called spytapes, wiretaps of phone calls Mpshe said indicated that the timing of the charges was manipulated by supporters of former president Thabo Mbeki.