Malema's lawyer: It's a political plot

It is quite clear that Sars, after they had made the compromise agreement with Mr Malema, something changed in Sars and there is a new move to sequestrate him for the sake of it. It has everything to do with politics, said Tumi Mokoena.

He said Malema would challenge the SA Revenue Services bid to sequestrate him.

 

If he is sequestrated he will lose his seat in Parliament.

Mokoena said Malemas initial tax bill of R16 million was reduced to R4 million, which was paid.

 

This was due to tax returns he failed to pay between 2006 and 2010.

With the collapse of the agreement, Sars now wanted an additional R14 million in interest and penalties.

There is no basis for them to levy that, Mokoena said.

If Malemas appeal against this failed they would take the matter to the Tax Court, Mokoena said.

Sarss bid to get an provisional sequestration order against the Economic Freedom Fighters leader will be heard
in the High Court in Pretoria on June 1.

 

Its an ongoing process of appeals. It will probably take years, Mokoena said.

Explaining what he thought had changed at Sars that led to the sequestration bid, Mokoena referred to the romantic
relationship between Sars official Johann van Loggerenberg, who had worked on Malemas tax agreement, and lawyer Belinda Walter.

Van Loggerenberg was investigated and resigned in February after Walter reported to the police and Sars that he
had disclosed confidential tax information to her.

 

This is a crime under the Income Tax Act.

According to Mokoena, citing news reports from last year: Van Loggerenberg& had sent WhatsApp messages to Belinda
Walter, in which he stated that the powers that be are not happy with the compromise agreement.

Its interesting that Mr Van Loggerenberg is no longer working for Sars [and] the interim commissioner [Ivan Pillay] was
kicked out.

Responding to a report that Sars was taking these new steps as Malemas tax payments were from dubious sources, Mokoena said Sars knew where the money came from. In addition there was nothing in the agreement requiring Malema to disclose the source of the payments.

Even if that was the case, they have been told who paid the monies. In the first place theres a loan for one million that was paid into the curators account and the details of the payment appear there. They knew as early as May last year where that money came from.

Author: News24 

NewsWire ID: 931