ConCourt rules possession, use of dagga by child not criminal offence
Updated | By Cliff Shiko
The Constitutional Court has ruled a section of the Drug and Drug Trafficking Act to be inconsistent with the Constitution as it criminalises the use and/or possession of cannabis by a child.
The matter stems from a case concerning four children who tested positive for dagga during a school-sanctioned drug test.
They were ordered to undergo compulsory diversion programmes.
The matter was brought by the Centre for Child Law against the NPA and five others, including the Justice Minister, Health Minister, Police Minister, Basic Education Minister, and Social Development Minister.
The landmark ruling was penned by Justice Nonkosi Mhlantla upheld the previous ruling by the High Court in Johannesburg.
The ruling follows the Prince-judgment which legalised the use, possession, and cultivation of cannabis by an adult in private for personal consumption.
However, the present case doesn't concern the legalisation of the use and/or possession of cannabis by a child.
Rather, this matter concerns whether the criminal justice system is the appropriate mechanism to respond to the use and/or possession of cannabis by a child.
"The operation of the order in paragraph 1 is suspended for a period of 24 months to enable Parliament to finalise the legislative reform process. During the period of suspension referred to in paragraph 2, no child may be arrested and/or prosecuted and/or diverted for contravening section 4(b) of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act in so far as it criminalises the use and/or possession of cannabis by a child.
"A child apprehended for the use and/or possession of cannabis may be referred to civil processes, including those found in the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 and the Prevention of and Treatment for Substance Abuse Act 70 of 2008."
In a unanimous decision, the apex court found that cannabis use is a social problem, and the appropriate response should be located in social systems as opposed to the criminal justice system.
The court found that there are more effective means than criminalising a child for the use and/or possession of cannabis.
Read the full judgment here:
[Judgment] CCT 210-21 Centre for Child Law v DPP and Others by anastasi mankese mokgobu on Scribd
Show's Stories
-
Man tries to help a baby kangaroo that wandered into his garden
We just have one question... who has a kangaroo costume just lying around?
The Workzone with Alex Jay 1 day, 17 hours ago -
Moms dial in on kid who dances in heels better than most women
This little boy has got moves and makes us want to dance into the weeken...
The Workzone with Elana Afrika-Bredenkamp 1 day, 17 hours ago